Index  •  FAQ  •  Search  

It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 9:59 am

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 Minneapolis VA Medical Center 
Author Message
 Post subject: Minneapolis VA Medical Center
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:52 pm 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 1:00 pm
Posts: 373
Image

One Veterans Drive
Minneapolis, MN 55417
Phone: (612) 725-2000


It's a shame that veterans are unable to protect themselves coming to and from the VA.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:11 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 9:55 pm
Posts: 742
Location: Twin Cities
Yup.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:00 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 10:25 am
Posts: 1772
Location: North Central Texas (now)
ALL Federal facilities seem to be posted. The AF reserve base is also posted.

_________________
A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you have. - Barry Goldwater

"...quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est." [...a sword never kills anybody; it's a tool in the killer's hand.] -- (Lucius Annaeus) Seneca "the Younger" (ca. 4 BC-65 AD),

The Nanny State MUST DIE!!!


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:02 pm 
Longtime Regular

Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 7:54 pm
Posts: 1941
Location: N 44°56.621` W 093°11.256 (St Paul)
So are most (not all) of the VFW's....................go figure :twisted:

Glad that you could get up to join us BigRobT.......... :wink:

.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:08 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 8:18 am
Posts: 1086
Location: Anoka, MN
I left the VFW when they endorsed Wellstone.

_________________
"Criminals thrive on the indulgence of society's understanding."

"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." - Sigmund Freud


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:25 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 1132
Location: Prior Lake, MN
That's "Wellstone!"

_________________
Brewman


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 5:40 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:24 am
Posts: 6767
Location: Twin Cities
The VA can't post under Minnesota statutes, but they can and do cite 18 USC 930:

This is what the post office sign says; I imagine the VA sign might be similar:

Image

Read the fine print: "Except as provided in subsection d..."

Subsection D is not on the sign. Here's what the subsection says:

Quote:
(d) Subsection (a) shall not apply to...the lawful carrying of firearms or other dangerous weapons in a Federal facility incident to hunting or other lawful purposes.


In other words, carrying guns into a federal facility for a lawful purpose is NOT prohibited. Is carrying a gun for personal protection, on a permit issued by the state, a lawful purpose?

I think it is.

_________________
* NRA, UT, MADFI certified Minnesota Permit to Carry instructor, and one of 66,513 law-abiding permit holders. Read my blog.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 5:48 pm 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 11:34 pm
Posts: 184
Location: Wretched Hive of Scum and Villainy
Andrew Rothman wrote:
Subsection D is not on the sign. Here's what the subsection says:

Quote:
(d) Subsection (a) shall not apply to...the lawful carrying of firearms or other dangerous weapons in a Federal facility incident to hunting or other lawful purposes.


In other words, carrying guns into a federal facility for a lawful purpose is NOT prohibited. Is carrying a gun for personal protection, on a permit issued by the state, a lawful purpose?

I think it is.


Has there ever been a case involving a permit holder and 18 USC 930?

_________________
Sliced bread? Nah. <a href=http://www.corneredcat.com/Basics/stance.aspx>Modern Isosceles</a>!


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 5:49 pm 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 5:39 pm
Posts: 426
Location: Central MN
Andrew Rothman wrote:
The VA can't post under Minnesota statutes, but they can and do cite 18 USC 930:

This is what the post office sign says; I imagine the VA sign might be similar:

Image

Read the fine print: "Except as provided in subsection d..."

Subsection D is not on the sign. Here's what the subsection says:

Quote:
(d) Subsection (a) shall not apply to...the lawful carrying of firearms or other dangerous weapons in a Federal facility incident to hunting or other lawful purposes.


In other words, carrying guns into a federal facility for a lawful purpose is NOT prohibited. Is carrying a gun for personal protection, on a permit issued by the state, a lawful purpose?

I think it is.


Why can't they put Section D on those signs...Are they truly anti and want to try and fool law abiding citizens? Bugs me...


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:47 pm 
Site Admin

Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 10:02 pm
Posts: 818
Location: downtown Mpls
glock+ipod wrote:
Has there ever been a case involving a permit holder and 18 USC 930?

I'm not aware of any.

Test cases are for other people. Got any other people handy?


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 7:14 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 10:25 am
Posts: 1772
Location: North Central Texas (now)
I don't live near the AF Reserve base. It's a solid hour away from me. It's posted with a non-MN compliant sign. I forget what it states, specifically. It can be read from the frontage rd. I'd be careful about taking pictures, if anybody thinks they could swing by there. I believe that it's red lettering on a white reflective background. The VA signs are more similar to what's posted at the AF Reserve base. They don't look at all like what the post office has.

_________________
A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you have. - Barry Goldwater

"...quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est." [...a sword never kills anybody; it's a tool in the killer's hand.] -- (Lucius Annaeus) Seneca "the Younger" (ca. 4 BC-65 AD),

The Nanny State MUST DIE!!!


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 8:26 pm 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 1:36 pm
Posts: 440
Location: W. St. Paul
Last time I was at the VA there were signs at the entrance of the parking lot. I don't remember the exact wording, something on the order of, "it is a felony to posses a firearm on hospital grounds".

_________________
I will never apologize for being an American!
http://post435gunclub.org/cmp.htm
cmpofficer@post435gunclub.org
http://mrra.org
6 down, 24 to go.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 8:28 pm 
1911 tainted
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 2:47 pm
Posts: 3045
That picture of the VA is old. I had to wait for 3 different trains before the light gave me a green arrow to go over the tracks into the VA today. They are one of my customers and am on site there ever week or so.

There is a sign posted warning of it being federal property and guns are banned, in fact I think that is what you see in the grass of the center median.

Edited to add - I just have to learn to type faster, right Rip Van Winkle.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 6:51 am 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 8:16 am
Posts: 364
Location: Minneapolis, MN
I used to be a VA police officer. It is indeed illegal to possess a firearm or ammunition on facility grounds - even in parking lots. I've seen some veterans prosecuted for having loose shotgun shells in their cars.

Something to be aware of if you go to the VA.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 7:00 am 
1911 tainted
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 2:47 pm
Posts: 3045
Erik_Pakieser wrote:
I've seen some veterans prosecuted for having loose shotgun shells in their cars.



So the VA LEO's are walking around and looking in each person's car in the parking lot? :shock:

Also, if the veterans that got prosecuted did not have a carry permit, well the law is black and white in that case.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours


 Who is online 

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


 
Index  |  FAQ  |  Search

phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group