Index  •  FAQ  •  Search  

It is currently Fri Apr 26, 2024 4:22 pm

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
 Tech student arrested at Wal-Mart 
Author Message
 Post subject: Tech student arrested at Wal-Mart
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 6:26 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 12:53 am
Posts: 725
Location: New Ulm area
Quote:
Tech student arrested at Wal-Mart
Text message about gang violence stokes concerns over student's gun
Nick Todaro, Reporter
03-19-2009

A Louisiana Tech student involved with a campus gun rights organization was arrested at Wal-Mart on Wednesday night.

Alfred Saurage, a vocal supporter of Rep. Ernest Wooton’s bill for allowing students to carry concealed weapons on campus, is a senior in mechanical engineering at Tech. He has said he openly wears a .45 caliber semi-automatic pistol when out and about in Ruston.

The gun drew unwanted attention Wednesday from store workers and members of the public at Wal-Mart, partly because of a separate report of impending gang-related gun violence at the store originating from text messages.

Ruston Police were called to the scene.

Capt. Kevin Peden said store management asked Saurage to remove his gun and put it in his car because he was scaring customers and workers. He refused. Louisiana law empowers the public display and carrying of firearms.

“Store management advised the Ruston Police officers that a text message was going around about a person that was going to enter Wal-Mart and kill two women employees,” Peden said in a release. “At this time, it is not known from where the texts originated.”

Officers approached Saurage and asked him to leave the store. He refused again.

He was arrested on a charge of entry or remaining in a place after being forbidden, and bond was set at $1,000.

“According to Louisiana law, it is legal to wear an exposed firearm so long as it does not create a disturbance or alarm any persons,” Peden said. “Mr. Saurage was obviously creating a disturbance and causing a great deal of concern in the store, to the point of customers approaching officers as they arrived. The store was well within its rights to ask Mr. Saurage to leave the store and not return to the store unless he was unarmed.”

Police are investigating the text messages, Peden said, in relation to reports of text messaging hoaxes at Wal-Mart stores in Delware and Maryland. Investigators in those states have been inundated with calls regarding a text message that has been circulating, warning of an alleged gang initiation in which women will be killed in Wal-Mart. It has been dismissed as an urban myth.

The text message in that area reportedly read: "i don't noe how tru dis is but here it is. Dont go 2 any walmarts 2nite ther will be a gang initiation n dey have 2 kill 3 women at each store. Tell ur love 1s.”

_________________
The only downfall to a 1911A1, is actually a plus: You can have it your way, and can put an unreal amount of money into em'.

Squeeze trigger, BANG, repeat. Kind of boring, but I never cared for drama.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 8:08 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 3:02 am
Posts: 816
Location: South of the River Suburbs
I could almost put my support behind this guy if I hadn't read the following part of the article:

Quote:
Capt. Kevin Peden said store management asked Saurage to remove his gun and put it in his car because he was scaring customers and workers. He refused. Louisiana law empowers the public display and carrying of firearms.

“Store management advised the Ruston Police officers that a text message was going around about a person that was going to enter Wal-Mart and kill two women employees,” Peden said in a release. “At this time, it is not known from where the texts originated.”

Officers approached Saurage and asked him to leave the store. He refused again.


Sure, I don't think we as carriers should be persecuted for taking common-sense measures to protect ourselves and our loved ones, but if a company tells me to leave, I will... and I'll never be back to any of their stores.

It also seems to me that as the law is written in MN he would in fact be guilty of tresspass for not leaving after a lawful request to do so.

_________________
My YouTube Videos

"We're either gonna be the best of friends or there's gonna be a whole lotta shootin' goin' on."

"I think it's a good thing for serving cops to mix with non-cops in a situation where they understand that they aren't in charge." -JoelR

"You'd be amazed at the things a bullet can stop." -Old Irish Proverb


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 8:44 pm 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 8:17 pm
Posts: 179
Location: Waconia, MN
Hmm, what a coincidence. I'm a mech. eng. who carries a .45 also.

Then again, I don't support his decision to "refuse" at all.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:07 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:40 pm
Posts: 2264
Location: Eden Prairie
Jai9100 wrote:
Hmm, what a coincidence. I'm a mech. eng. who carries a .45 also.

Then again, I don't support his decision to "refuse" at all.


Nor do I. They have the right to ask me to leave, and I have the right to take my hard-earned cash elsewhere.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:36 pm 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 12:22 pm
Posts: 339
Location: Suburban Twin Cities, MN
Jai9100 wrote:
Hmm, what a coincidence. I'm a mech. eng. who carries a .45 also.

Then again, I don't support his decision to "refuse" at all.


Maybe he's willing to be a test case?
:)


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 11:36 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 11:39 pm
Posts: 533
Location: Mankato Area
I think he was wrong to refuse to leave but text messages don't suddenly appear from thin air. They have to come from someone. I think if they make the text message an issue in this case, they should be able to find out who sent it.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 12:06 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 12:37 pm
Posts: 1757
Location: Whittier
The text message was actually a pretty widespread internent thing. . . kinda like years ago when there was the scare about HIV infected needles on gas pump handles. It popped up a few days ago even on other local boards. . . seems like I saw it on the MNSportBike board. Don't even know if ther text messages were real . . . may have run all it's distance via chain emails.



The idiocy of failing to leave when asked has of course already been mentioned +1.

_________________
Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a
lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become
a law unto himself; it invites anarchy .” Olmstead v. U.S., 277 U.S. 438


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 8:06 am 
Journeyman Member

Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 53
Location: St. Paul
This guy is an idiot. Classic case of someone that I prefer to "stay off my side."


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 8:09 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:23 pm
Posts: 1419
Location: SE MPLS
mrokern wrote:
Jai9100 wrote:
Hmm, what a coincidence. I'm a mech. eng. who carries a .45 also.

Then again, I don't support his decision to "refuse" at all.


Nor do I. They have the right to ask me to leave, and I have the right to take my hard-earned cash elsewhere.

If I'm reading it right, he wasn't charged with carrying, or with disturbing the peace. He was charged with failing to leave after having been ordered to by someone who had the authority to do so.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 8:41 am 
Longtime Regular

Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 4:56 pm
Posts: 1109
Considering the circumstances at the store, And how the police first asked him to put away the gun, The guy was totally wrong.

He was asking for trouble, and he got it.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 9:05 am 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 6:42 pm
Posts: 306
Location: Burnsville, MN
when they ask you to leave a private est it is time to go

_________________
""Driving While Black." There are some cops -- just some -- who appear to think that this is a crime on the books.
"Excuse me, sir; did you know how black you were driving?"" joelr
Springfield XD-9 Daily Carry woot


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 11:07 am 
Junior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 11:47 am
Posts: 14
Location: Waconia
+1 on he should have left

_________________
I love that new Kahr smell!


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 11:48 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:24 am
Posts: 6767
Location: Twin Cities
From the article, it appears that THE STORE NEVER ASKED HIM TO LEAVE.

If that's true, the cops have no authority to make him do so, and he appears to have acted within his rights.

This guy isn't a troublemaker, he's Rosa Parks.

Way to pile on, guys.

_________________
* NRA, UT, MADFI certified Minnesota Permit to Carry instructor, and one of 66,513 law-abiding permit holders. Read my blog.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 11:56 am 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 2:17 pm
Posts: 351
Location: west 'burbs
I don't want to be the test case, but I agree with Andrew's take on this one.

_________________
For English, press 1


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 12:05 pm 
Journeyman Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 9:38 am
Posts: 71
Andrew Rothman wrote:
From the article, it appears that THE STORE NEVER ASKED HIM TO LEAVE.

If that's true, the cops have no authority to make him do so, and he appears to have acted within his rights.


The store may not have directly, but if an officer gives you a direct order, and you refuse....


Offline
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours


 Who is online 

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 145 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron


 
Index  |  FAQ  |  Search

phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group