Index  •  FAQ  •  Search  

It is currently Mon Apr 29, 2024 10:42 am

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 5 posts ] 
 How bad if SCOTUS rules against Incorporation? 
Author Message
 Post subject: How bad if SCOTUS rules against Incorporation?
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 12:04 pm 
Senior Member

Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 8:53 am
Posts: 239
.Basically, how bad would it be if SCOTUS ruled against Incorporation for the 2nd Amendment?



In reality, most states protect the 2nd Amendment in their own state constitutions, right?
.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: How bad if SCOTUS rules against Incorporation?
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 12:13 pm 
The Man
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 5:43 am
Posts: 7970
Location: Minneapolis MN
1. Very.

2. Yeah, but see how well that's worked out in, say, Hawaii?

_________________
Just a guy.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: How bad if SCOTUS rules against Incorporation?
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 1:20 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 9:57 am
Posts: 818
Location: Apple Valley, MN
1) Basically except for some very limited cases, the Second Amendment would cease to exist

B) Subject to change and/or being ignored by that state

_________________
http://www.eckernet.com
My mind is like a steel trap - rusty and illegal in 37 states.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: How bad if SCOTUS rules against Incorporation?
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 2:41 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:23 pm
Posts: 1419
Location: SE MPLS
kecker wrote:
Basically except for some very limited cases, the Second Amendment would cease to exist

The Individual Right to Keep and Bear Arms does not exist because of the Second Amendment, and would continue to exist were the Second Amendment repealed.

Unfortunately, the history shows that periods in which a government's understanding of what their individual citizen's rights are were at significant disconnect from what those rights actually aren't necessarily pleasant to live through.

_________________
Jeff Dege


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: How bad if SCOTUS rules against Incorporation?
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 8:42 pm 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 12:22 pm
Posts: 339
Location: Suburban Twin Cities, MN
usmarine0352 wrote:
.Basically, how bad would it be if SCOTUS ruled against Incorporation for the 2nd Amendment?

In reality, most states protect the 2nd Amendment in their own state constitutions, right?
.


Very little would change automatically. I believe that only the 9th Cir. applies the 2nd Amendment to the states at the moment, and that's a recent development. Gun control would remain largely a state by state issue.

Yes, most states have their own version of the 2nd Amendment. (MN does not) The effectiveness of those provisions varies on the whims of those states' supreme court.


Offline
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 5 posts ] 

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours


 Who is online 

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 297 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


 
Index  |  FAQ  |  Search

phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group