Author |
Message |
PocketProtector642
|
Post subject: Was Freud Correct? Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 11:40 am |
|
Longtime Regular |
|
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:36 am Posts: 702 Location: St. Paulish
|
A funny thought from Alan Korwin's Page Nine... Quote: WAS FREUD CORRECT? Does this explain elements of hoplophobia, and the position of many leftists? "A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." --Sigmund Freud, General Introduction to Psychoanalysis
_________________ Proud owner of 2 wonderful SGH holsters. "If man will not work, he shall not eat" (2 Th 3:14) "If you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one" -Jesus (Luke 22:36)
|
|
|
|
|
MostlyHarmless
|
Post subject: Re: Was Freud Correct? Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:06 pm |
|
Senior Member |
|
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 3:24 pm Posts: 471 Location: 12 miles east of Lake Wobegon
|
Freud was wrong on many things.
It is my experience that many otherwise mature, rational, and sexually secure adults have an irrational fear of weapons.
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Matheny
|
Post subject: Re: Was Freud Correct? Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:17 pm |
|
Longtime Regular |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 9:36 am Posts: 753 Location: No. 12 Grimauld Place, London W1
|
The fear and loathing of guns by people on the left is something of an illusion.
When you examine the idea at all, you see that they don't mind guns in the hands of left-wingers. I'm not just being snarky about this. Che Guevara had a window specially installed in his office at La Cabana prison so he could watch executions of hundreds of Cubans who had been wealthy, opposed to his regime, or openly religious. He, obviously, liked the guns in the hands of the firing squads. I would bet that not even one member in 20,000 of Moveon.org would object to a poster of Che Guevara holding a gun.
Sarah Palin holding a gun, now, that would drive them bughouse batshit. So it's not the guns themselves, it's who's in possession of them.
_________________ "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." -- George Orwell
|
|
|
|
|
Moby Clarke
|
Post subject: Re: Was Freud Correct? Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:02 pm |
|
Longtime Regular |
|
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 9:09 pm Posts: 965 Location: North Minneapolis
|
I agree with Dave. Everytime new gun legislation is offered, what is the one caveat; the Police and military are exempt. Why is that, those groups are controled by government. P2C holders are not, hence the GG's fear of us.
_________________ It is about Liberty!
Political Correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical liberal minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
Chris
|
|
|
|
|
Macx
|
Post subject: Re: Was Freud Correct? Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:31 pm |
|
Longtime Regular |
|
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 12:37 pm Posts: 1757 Location: Whittier
|
They should. Some of us have become disillusioned and not just a lil pissed off.
_________________ Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a
lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become
a law unto himself; it invites anarchy .” Olmstead v. U.S., 277 U.S. 438
|
|
|
|
|
MostlyHarmless
|
Post subject: Re: Was Freud Correct? Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 6:59 am |
|
Senior Member |
|
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 3:24 pm Posts: 471 Location: 12 miles east of Lake Wobegon
|
I think that it's important to understand the reasoning and motives that drive gun-control proponents. Know thine enemy. Characterizing them as a bunch of liberal whackos with penis envy is neither accurate nor insightful.
I divide ggs into three categories:
1) People who out of ignorance and exposure to misinformation (often from TV and movies) don't understand that firearms, properly selected and used, are safe and effective tools for various tasks.
2) People who make a conscious decision to lead a life of nonviolence with a full appreciation for the personal consequences this has. These people are rare and their faith often plays a large role in their lives. Though small in numbers, they are outspoken. Their effect on public policy has been limited post-9/11 because most people don't accept the underlying premise of their message.
3) People whose trust in governments is greater than their trust in individual decision-making. Generally, they underestimate the safety and effectiveness of empowering individuals (e.g. they make the "wild west" argument for safety and the "middle aged white guy" argument for effectiveness), and overestimate the transformative power of government (arguing that substantial reductions in violence can be achieved by concentrating availability of the means in the hands of government actors).
Trivializing and mocking the ggs takes the focus away from the real debate and the real issues, whether amongst ourselves or in wider public discourse. It's not about genitalia or mental illness, it's about differences in deeply held viewpoints about the role of government and individual rights.
|
|
|
|
|
bensdad
|
Post subject: Re: Was Freud Correct? Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:38 am |
|
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 9:55 pm Posts: 598 Location: Dundas, Minnesota
|
MostlyHarmless wrote: I think that it's important to understand the reasoning and motives that drive gun-control proponents. Know thine enemy. Characterizing them as a bunch of liberal whackos with penis envy is neither accurate nor insightful.
I divide ggs into three categories:
1) People who out of ignorance and exposure to misinformation (often from TV and movies) don't understand that firearms, properly selected and used, are safe and effective tools for various tasks.
2) People who make a conscious decision to lead a life of nonviolence with a full appreciation for the personal consequences this has. These people are rare and their faith often plays a large role in their lives. Though small in numbers, they are outspoken. Their effect on public policy has been limited post-9/11 because most people don't accept the underlying premise of their message.
3) People whose trust in governments is greater than their trust in individual decision-making. Generally, they underestimate the safety and effectiveness of empowering individuals (e.g. they make the "wild west" argument for safety and the "middle aged white guy" argument for effectiveness), and overestimate the transformative power of government (arguing that substantial reductions in violence can be achieved by concentrating availability of the means in the hands of government actors).
Trivializing and mocking the ggs takes the focus away from the real debate and the real issues, whether amongst ourselves or in wider public discourse. It's not about genitalia or mental illness, it's about differences in deeply held viewpoints about the role of government and individual rights. + eleventy-billion. This post should be a poster.
_________________ I say I'm cleaning guns... My wife says I'm petting them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 7 posts ] |
|
This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.
All times are UTC - 6 hours
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|