Index  •  FAQ  •  Search  

It is currently Wed May 08, 2024 2:49 pm

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 11 posts ] 
 shooting in rural MN 
Author Message
 Post subject: shooting in rural MN
PostPosted: Sun Apr 23, 2006 3:12 pm 
Forum Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:37 pm
Posts: 1571
Location: Detroit Lakes, MN
Sunday, April 23, 2006

I today had a permit class of one person ... he was from Otter Tail County.

He had a question that was regarding the law of shooting in a rural area.

He lives in rural Otter Tail County in an area with no local Police Department. There is a neighbor that has on occassion fired a shotgun (while on his own private property) for clay target shooting. Apparently the shots fired would go over a gravel public road.

His question was whether or not there is any regulation about shooting that near or over a public road, even if otherwise safely done.

I responded that in most rural areas the only restriction in general was that the target shooting must be done safely, but I am not aware if there is a statutory rule about roads etc.

So my question is:

1. is the shooting over a gravel public road inherently dangerous so that even if the shooter is on private property (his own) that the act itself is prohibited; and,

2. is there any statutory distance from roads or other structures etc. or is it just the general "be safe" provisions ?

I found some hunting legislation about shooting over an improved road, but did not find something on the specific point and was hoping someone here knows the answer so I don't waste too much more time researching this :)

Paul Horvick

_________________
Paul Horvick
http://shootingsafely.com
---
Contact us to schedule a class for you and your friends, and check our website for more information http://shootingsafely.com


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 23, 2006 4:56 pm 
Senior Member

Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 4:48 pm
Posts: 429
Location: Minnetonka
I can ask one of the cops next time I am at my cabin.

FWIW, we were shooting a 22 at some spinning targets my neighbor up there on Big Pine Lake made in his shop. There's a big hill for a backstop, and it's quite safe. The police don't mind, and it's only a few dozen yards from highway 53.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: shooting in rural MN
PostPosted: Sun Apr 23, 2006 5:11 pm 
1911 tainted
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 2:47 pm
Posts: 3045
phorvick wrote:

I found some hunting legislation about shooting over an improved road


Paul Horvick

And that would have to be in the big game section of the DNR game laws, which it would be illegal.
You can stand in the middle of a road and shoot a pheasent sitting in the center of that road. Safe practice, probably not. Legal, yes. One of our local DNR Officers use to start out his presentation to the kids in our Minnesota Firearm Safety class with that same question. Most answer no, but that is only listed as illegal when hunting big game, not small game. Don't know off hand where turkeys come in to this.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: shooting in rural MN
PostPosted: Sun Apr 23, 2006 5:40 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:24 am
Posts: 6767
Location: Twin Cities
cobb wrote:
Don't know off hand where turkeys come in to this.


Clearly it depends on the size of the turkey.
Image

_________________
* NRA, UT, MADFI certified Minnesota Permit to Carry instructor, and one of 66,513 law-abiding permit holders. Read my blog.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 1:10 pm 
Longtime Regular

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:53 pm
Posts: 1725
Shooting accross a road is illegal atleast for hunting and probably for other type of shooting as well.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 1:20 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:24 am
Posts: 6767
Location: Twin Cities
Nope. As Cobb said, that state law refers only to big game hunting.

There are city ordinances about shooting near roads, but out in the sticks, there's nothing I've found.

grayskys wrote:
Shooting accross a road is illegal atleast for hunting and probably for other type of shooting as well.

_________________
* NRA, UT, MADFI certified Minnesota Permit to Carry instructor, and one of 66,513 law-abiding permit holders. Read my blog.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: The Statute
PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 1:46 pm 
Longtime Regular

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:53 pm
Posts: 1725
Called the DNR got the statute.
MN Statute 97b.005 wrote:
97B.055 Discharging firearms and bows and arrows.

Subdivision 1. Restrictions related to highways. (a)
A person may not discharge a firearm or an arrow from a bow on,
over, or across an improved public highway at a big game
animal. A person may not discharge a firearm or bow and arrow
within the right-of-way of an improved public highway at a big
game animal. The commissioner may by rule extend the
application of this subdivision to the taking of migratory
waterfowl in designated locations.

(b) A person may not discharge a firearm or an arrow from a
bow on, over, across, or within the right-of-way of an improved
public highway at a decoy of a big game animal that has been set
out by a licensed peace officer.

http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/97B/

I personally think it is not a good idea to discharge a firearm across a road for anything but self-defence.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Statute
PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 8:15 pm 
1911 tainted
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 2:47 pm
Posts: 3045
grayskys wrote:
Called the DNR got the statute.
MN Statute 97b.005 wrote:
97B.055 Discharging firearms and bows and arrows.

Subdivision 1. Restrictions related to highways. (a)
A person may not discharge a firearm or an arrow from a bow on,
over, or across an improved public highway at a big game
animal. A person may not discharge a firearm or bow and arrow
within the right-of-way of an improved public highway at a big
game animal. The commissioner may by rule extend the
application of this subdivision to the taking of migratory
waterfowl in designated locations.

(b) A person may not discharge a firearm or an arrow from a
bow on, over, across, or within the right-of-way of an improved
public highway at a decoy of a big game animal that has been set
out by a licensed peace officer.

http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/97B/

I personally think it is not a good idea to discharge a firearm across a road for anything but self-defence.


Exactly as we said, big game animals, not small game.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: shooting in rural MN
PostPosted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 7:49 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:54 am
Posts: 5270
Location: Minneapolis
cobb wrote:
Don't know off hand where turkeys come in to this.


Turkeys were officially big game until this year. Now they're not; according to the licensing requirements. But, you still need a special license, site tag, and stamp to take one, so they're not quite in the general classification of small game.

_________________
I am defending myself... in favor of that!


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 8:11 am 
Designated waste of protoplasm
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 4:41 pm
Posts: 1807
Location: Western Burbs of MPLS
DON'T SHOOT ACROSS A ROAD - YOU ARE ASKING FOR TROUBLE.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 8:20 am 
Forum Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:37 pm
Posts: 1571
Location: Detroit Lakes, MN
Pinnacle wrote:
DON'T SHOOT ACROSS A ROAD - YOU ARE ASKING FOR TROUBLE.
Well, of course, that is obvious. But, there are roads and there are roads. The original question pertained to a very lightly travelled gravel road. It apparently is legal (if not wise).

I did hear back from the local Sheriff and he concurred that in rural areas that do not have any rules on discharging firearms, that this shooter's actions were probably legal if not done recklessly or in manner to be disturbing the peace etc.

_________________
Paul Horvick
http://shootingsafely.com
---
Contact us to schedule a class for you and your friends, and check our website for more information http://shootingsafely.com


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 11 posts ] 

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours


 Who is online 

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


 
Index  |  FAQ  |  Search

phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group