Twin Cities Carry Forum Archive
http://www.twincitiescarry.com/forum/

DC vs Heller oral arguments
http://www.twincitiescarry.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=36&t=8147
Page 1 of 5

Author:  KonaSeven [ Sat Mar 15, 2008 5:31 pm ]
Post subject:  DC vs Heller oral arguments

Quote:
On March 18, 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in District of Columbia v. Heller. The Court announced its decision to take the case in which plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of the District's gun ban last Fall. The District of Columbia appealed a lower court’s ruling last year affirming that the Second Amendment of the Constitution protects an individual right to keep and bear arms, and that the District’s bans on handguns, carrying firearms within the home, and possession of loaded or operable firearms for self-defense violate that right.

In March, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit held that “[T]he phrase ‘the right of the people,’ when read intratextually and in light of Supreme Court precedent, leads us to conclude that the right in question is individual.” The D.C. Circuit also rejected the claim that the Second Amendment does not apply to the District of Columbia because D.C. is not a state.

The case marks the first time a Second Amendment challenge to a firearm law has reached the Supreme Court since 1939.



More here.

Author:  Lawyer_in_Training [ Mon Mar 17, 2008 9:05 pm ]
Post subject: 

SCOTUS Blog will likely have early reports Tuesday:

http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/tomorrow-on-scotusblog-full-coverage-of-dc-guns-oral-argument/

Author:  Srigs [ Mon Mar 17, 2008 11:00 pm ]
Post subject: 

It will be interesting to read the transcripts. I'm hoping for the best.

Author:  plblark [ Tue Mar 18, 2008 7:20 am ]
Post subject: 

Hoping for the best here too. a LOT of people went to a lot of VERY thoughtful work to file an incredible number of Amicus briefs supporting Heller.

The audio should be available this evening so you can listen to the arguments and inflection.

Author:  KonaSeven [ Tue Mar 18, 2008 8:16 am ]
Post subject: 

CSPAN coverage is now underway.

Author:  mrokern [ Tue Mar 18, 2008 8:25 am ]
Post subject: 

KonaSeven wrote:
CSPAN coverage is now underway.


Live stream of their coverage is available via the CSPAN website.

Author:  plblark [ Tue Mar 18, 2008 8:32 am ]
Post subject: 

thank you both!

Author:  plblark [ Tue Mar 18, 2008 8:41 am ]
Post subject: 

Am I doing this wrong? I'm getting the American Constitution Society 03/13/08 debate.

Author:  Lenny7 [ Tue Mar 18, 2008 8:41 am ]
Post subject: 

I picked a good day to work from home. I'm watching some roundtable hosed by the American Constitution Society. Are the actual hearing being broadcast live?

ETA: Car Bogus, professor at Roger Williams U. Law School is claiming that the NRA doesn't want this decided against DC because it takes away their ability to fund raise. He claims that "radical libertarians" are the ones that are ones who are claiming 2A is here to protect against tyrannical gov't.

Author:  Lawyer_in_Training [ Tue Mar 18, 2008 8:46 am ]
Post subject: 

Quote:
The Supreme Court will release the audio recording of oral argument in the following case on an expedited basis: District of Columbia v. Heller, scheduled at 10 a.m. on Tuesday, March 18, 2008. The audio recording will be released shortly after the conclusion of the argument.


http://www.supremecourtus.gov/publicinfo/press/pr_03-04-08.html

Author:  Andrew Rothman [ Tue Mar 18, 2008 8:46 am ]
Post subject: 

It'll be 10:30 local time before we start to hear anything.

http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategori ... -argument/

Author:  ree [ Tue Mar 18, 2008 8:46 am ]
Post subject: 

CSPAN has the oral arguments scheduled from 10:30-12 central. They're filling time with germane albeit frustrating discussion instead of just covering the House.

Author:  mrokern [ Tue Mar 18, 2008 8:50 am ]
Post subject: 

Lenny7 wrote:

ETA: Car Bogus, professor at Roger Williams U. Law School is claiming that the NRA doesn't want this decided against DC because it takes away their ability to fund raise. He claims that "radical libertarians" are the ones that are ones who are claiming 2A is here to protect against tyrannical gov't.


Be aware, Carl Bogus is a board member of the Brady Bunch.

-Mark

Author:  Lenny7 [ Tue Mar 18, 2008 8:51 am ]
Post subject: 

mrokern wrote:
Be aware, Carl Bogus is a board member of the Brady Bunch.


Don't worry, I won't be taken in by the dark side...

Author:  plblark [ Tue Mar 18, 2008 8:54 am ]
Post subject: 

Carl also strongly asserted that instead of picturing minutemen we should picture slaveholders in fear of slave risings.

now he's saying all the scholarly work was settled and recognized a collective right.

Page 1 of 5 All times are UTC - 6 hours
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/