Plaxico Burress 2 YEARS IN JAIL FOR NYC FIREARM POSSESION.
Author |
Message |
12smile
|
Post subject: Plaxico Burress 2 YEARS IN JAIL FOR NYC FIREARM POSSESION. Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 12:26 am |
|
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 2:03 am Posts: 227
|
His attorney questioned the recommended prison sentence. "This was not an intentional criminal act," Brafman said the day of the plea. "In my judgment, a two-year prison sentence is a very severe punishment." Just a little reality check here, I daily enjoy the protection of my concealed firearm and this poor slob gets to spend 2 years in prison for POSSESION of a firearm. His possesion was revealed in a negligent discharge in a nightclub where he was wounded in the thigh. He could have faced 3 1/2 years if convicted on all possible charges. So ....this could be Minnesota if not for [ ...you fill in the blank...] Billionaire Michael Bloomberg mayor of NYC was elected democratically in a free election by the citizens of NYC. 2 years in prison vs. the freedom we enjoy in Mn....Thanks Gun Rights Activists for the previous 2 decades of uphill struggle.
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew Rothman
|
Post subject: Re: Plaxico Burress 2 YEARS IN JAIL FOR NYC FIREARM POSSESION. Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 1:23 am |
|
Longtime Regular |
|
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:24 am Posts: 6767 Location: Twin Cities
|
|
|
|
|
rusty shackleford
|
Post subject: Re: Plaxico Burress 2 YEARS IN JAIL FOR NYC FIREARM POSSESION. Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:23 pm |
|
Member |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 12:47 pm Posts: 32
|
As much as we can all probably agree ole Plax is a dumbass for not using a holster, this really pisses me off. You mean to tell me that if I even possess a handgun in these places I'm looking at years of imprisonment? Is the constitution not applicable to NYC, Chicago, etc? Not to mention that the handgun ban has obviously made huge strides in reducing crime in these cities.
|
|
|
|
|
Q_Continuum
|
Post subject: Re: Plaxico Burress 2 YEARS IN JAIL FOR NYC FIREARM POSSESION. Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:48 am |
|
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2008 2:43 am Posts: 371 Location: Anoka, MN
|
rusty shackleford wrote: As much as we can all probably agree ole Plax is a dumbass for not using a holster, this really pisses me off. You mean to tell me that if I even possess a handgun in these places I'm looking at years of imprisonment? Is the constitution not applicable to NYC, Chicago, etc? Not to mention that the handgun ban has obviously made huge strides in reducing crime in these cities. Well, my general rule is that unless I *HAVE* to, I won't go anywhere my XD's can't. So, by being so bass-ackwards, I'm refusing to *EVER* step foot in their territory, and by extension, EVER give them my money.
|
|
|
|
|
joelr
|
Post subject: Re: Plaxico Burress 2 YEARS IN JAIL FOR NYC FIREARM POSSESION. Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 5:29 am |
|
The Man |
|
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 5:43 am Posts: 7970 Location: Minneapolis MN
|
rusty shackleford wrote: As much as we can all probably agree ole Plax is a dumbass for not using a holster, this really pisses me off. You mean to tell me that if I even possess a handgun in these places I'm looking at years of imprisonment? Yes. Quick check: if a multimillionaire sports star with millions of adoring fans and no criminal record does, you would, too.
_________________ Just a guy.
|
|
|
|
|
rusty shackleford
|
Post subject: Re: Plaxico Burress 2 YEARS IN JAIL FOR NYC FIREARM POSSESION. Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 9:01 am |
|
Member |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 12:47 pm Posts: 32
|
joelr wrote: rusty shackleford wrote: As much as we can all probably agree ole Plax is a dumbass for not using a holster, this really pisses me off. You mean to tell me that if I even possess a handgun in these places I'm looking at years of imprisonment? Yes. Quick check: if a multimillionaire sports star with millions of adoring fans and no criminal record does, you would, too. I've got the millions of adoring fans and no record, but sadly, still working on the multimillionaire part of the equation. If only Mom didn't throw away all my baseball cards....
|
|
|
|
|
peter94
|
Post subject: Re: Plaxico Burress 2 YEARS IN JAIL FOR NYC FIREARM POSSESION. Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 10:07 am |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 3:22 pm Posts: 21
|
I thought his sentance was to send a message to all the other football/basketball stars that they are not invincible from the law? In other words had this happened to a normal person, the sentance would have been much less.
|
|
|
|
|
kimberman
|
Post subject: Re: Plaxico Burress 2 YEARS IN JAIL FOR NYC FIREARM POSSESION. Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 11:01 am |
|
Wise Elder |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 7:48 pm Posts: 2782 Location: St. Paul
|
peter94 wrote: I thought his sentance was to send a message to all the other football/basketball stars that they are not invincible from the law? In other words had this happened to a normal person, the sentence would have been much less. Absolutely correct. The IRS does this too. If they want the publicity, no decent bargain is possible. Same for Martha Stewart.
_________________ President of AACFI, GOCRA, CCRN, and A2A
|
|
|
|
|
joelr
|
Post subject: Re: Plaxico Burress 2 YEARS IN JAIL FOR NYC FIREARM POSSESION. Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 2:58 pm |
|
The Man |
|
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 5:43 am Posts: 7970 Location: Minneapolis MN
|
kimberman wrote: peter94 wrote: I thought his sentance was to send a message to all the other football/basketball stars that they are not invincible from the law? In other words had this happened to a normal person, the sentence would have been much less. Absolutely correct. The IRS does this too. If they want the publicity, no decent bargain is possible. Same for Martha Stewart. That's true for the IRS, but I've read from folks who practice there that this isn't an unusual sentence, at all. I think, though, a celebrity might have gotten a sweeter deal there if there hadn't been publicity.
_________________ Just a guy.
|
|
|
|
|
Dick Unger
|
Post subject: Re: Plaxico Burress 2 YEARS IN JAIL FOR NYC FIREARM POSSESION. Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 7:00 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 2:54 am Posts: 2444 Location: West Central MN
|
It's not right, but a gun possession charge is really easy to prosecute. So if you're a cop, and run into a sh*tbag that's obviously getting ready to rob or shoot somebody, and you find the gun it' gotcha. Proving the sh*tbag is planning a caper, or waiting until he commitss the crime and proving he did it is harder of course.
When these laws are passed, that's the picture presented, I think. Putting this guy in prison is kind of ridiculous. But that's what happens with mandatory sentencing. If judges had discrection, they'd send the crooks to prison, and put this guy on probation.
We could solve this by not making sentences mandatory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 10 posts ] |
|
This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.
All times are UTC - 6 hours
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 168 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|