Author |
Message |
Ramoel
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 11:13 am |
|
Longtime Regular |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 8:52 pm Posts: 826 Location: MN
|
No hammer block in a 642 since there is no exposed hammer to hit on anything.
_________________ Ron
NRA Life Member
USS Bristol DD857
_________________________
If life was fair, Robins couldn't eat worms...
|
|
|
|
|
cobb
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 11:57 am |
|
1911 tainted |
|
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 2:47 pm Posts: 3045
|
Ramoel wrote: No hammer block in a 642 since there is no exposed hammer to hit on anything.
I was referring to plblark's comment, I was guessing that was what flew on him when he was removing the side plate of a S&W revolver.
|
|
|
|
|
Ramoel
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 3:04 pm |
|
Longtime Regular |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 8:52 pm Posts: 826 Location: MN
|
Sorry Cobb, I wasn't trying to nit-pick on anyone about the hammer block. Until I got a 642 and opened it up I thought all S&W's had a hammer block. I figured it was an interesting fact that many might not be aware of.
When I took the sideplate off mine, my first thought was that the factory had forgotten to install it. After looking closer I saw that it didn't have provision for one and figured it was because of the enclosed hammer.
_________________ Ron
NRA Life Member
USS Bristol DD857
_________________________
If life was fair, Robins couldn't eat worms...
|
|
|
|
|
cobb
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 3:16 pm |
|
1911 tainted |
|
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 2:47 pm Posts: 3045
|
Ramoel wrote: Sorry Cobb, I wasn't trying to nit-pick on anyone about the hammer block. Until I got a 642 and opened it up I thought all S&W's had a hammer block. I figured it was an interesting fact that many might not be aware of.
When I took the sideplate off mine, my first thought was that the factory had forgotten to install it. After looking closer I saw that it didn't have provision for one and figured it was because of the enclosed hammer.
Actually I didn't even think of that and never thought you nick picking, just spreading a little more knowledge. I've never had the side plate off of my 642, but have had it off several Smiths with hammers though. Basically I was kinda ribbing plblark because I figured he made his statement because he lost a part when removing a side plate on a Smith and the only thing that I thought that would readily fly away was the hammer block.
|
|
|
|
|
MNBud
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 3:33 pm |
|
Longtime Regular |
|
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 4:01 am Posts: 586 Location: west suburb
|
And also be sure you use a set of quality screw drivers or you WILL bugger up the slots on the screws and you will notice it every time you pick up the gun. I bought a used revolver (686) that a home gunsmith/blacksmith had tried to take the side plate off and messed up one of the screw heads.
_________________ Just because you know your paranoid doesn't mean somebody's not out to get you.
|
|
|
|
|
Ramoel
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 6:43 pm |
|
Longtime Regular |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 8:52 pm Posts: 826 Location: MN
|
Good point on the screwdrivers MNBud. Brownell's sells a nice set of gunsmith screwdrivers. You shouldn't try to remove a S&W sideplate without the proper tools.
For those not familiar with gunsmith screwdrivers, they are hollow ground, not tapered like your normal household screwdriver. When you stick the proper driver into the screw slot it will stick there and won't mar the edges when you turn the screw. The normal tapered screwdriver bit will try to climb out of the slot and ruin the edges.
_________________ Ron
NRA Life Member
USS Bristol DD857
_________________________
If life was fair, Robins couldn't eat worms...
|
|
|
|
|
johnalbert
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 11:40 pm |
|
Senior Member |
|
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:06 am Posts: 126 Location: Cottage Grove
|
*raises hand* QUESTION!
Dry fire 50 time per day. Check
Added Crest to my list of multi-taskers. Check
Now the question.
With or without snap-caps?
|
|
|
|
|
MNBud
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 4:07 am |
|
Longtime Regular |
|
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 4:01 am Posts: 586 Location: west suburb
|
johnalbert wrote: *raises hand* QUESTION! Dry fire 50 time per day. Check Added Crest to my list of multi-taskers. Check Now the question. With or without snap-caps?
I believe the answer you will get the most is you don't need to use snap caps in modern revolvers. My answer is, I have snap caps that I use to practice loading with a speed loader and strip loaders so I put them in any time I will be dry firing.
_________________ Just because you know your paranoid doesn't mean somebody's not out to get you.
|
|
|
|
|
plblark
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 5:07 am |
|
Longtime Regular |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 10:41 am Posts: 4468
|
Question about the toothpaste idea:
I've heard it from a couple places and it seems to make sense. The Question:
What about unintended consequences? When an action job is done, very specific work is done on specific parts to get the desired effect. With this fill the cavity method, ALL the moving arts are being micro-abraded. Isn't that potentially wearing on parts that have no effect on the "action" or which you may not need / WANT to be abraded?
_________________ Certified Carry Permit Instructor (MNTactics.com and ShootingSafely.com) Click here for current Carry Classes "There is no safety for honest men, except by believing all possible evil of evil men." - Edwin Burke
|
|
|
|
|
This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.
All times are UTC - 6 hours
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|